Posted on 01/23/2007 8:52:26 PM PST by John W
I'd like to develop space factories which land on asteroids and process them into something useful. With a long enough lead time, why just move things around?
You would need space docking and refueling. What would the propulsion system be? It would need to catch asteroids early enough that small changes in their orbits would translate to clean misses of earth. You can't do that in low earth orbit!
But just think of what it would mean to have a craft that could flit around the inner solar system with enough power to nudge asteroids! Just that technology alone could open up space travel!
Gravitational pull is determined by mass and distance. Distanc eisn't much of a problem but you're going to have to have a lot of mass to get the asteroid moved in time unless we can get far away from Earth to alter it's pass before it gets close.
Seems unrealistic but a novel idea anyways.
A tractor of that magnitude would have to have a LOT of mass to make enough of a difference. Ping for later research
Comes with previous crash experience.
The gravity tractor method is feasible if the threatening asteroid is detected early enough and at a sufficient distance from Earth. Based on calculations, it’s theorized that a 20 ton spacecraft could sufficiently deflect a typical 200 meter in diameter asteroid if given a lead time of 20 years. Deflecting a larger asteroid would require a spacecraft of greater mass or more lead time.
Whatever methods are employed to divert the trajectory of asteroids, early detection and better understanding of the objects are critical. That’s why there is great interest in funding increased efforts to explore known Near-Earth Orbit objects and search for presently undetected NEO objects.
Space barge!
I'm catching on here.
Now I think I know where they get polaroids.
http://www.space.com/news/051103_asteroid_apophis.html
More info.....
Asteroid 99942 Apophis – first labeled as 2004 MN4 -- is estimated to be roughly 1,000 feet (320 meters) in diameter. Were it to strike Earth, it would not set off global havoc but would generate significant local or regional damage, experts say.
However
The ruin stemming from asteroid Apophis colliding with Earth would potentially be very great.
Indeed, the consequences, Schweickart suggested, would dwarf those seen as a result of the Indian Ocean tsunami in December 2004, hurricanes Katrina and Rita in September of this year, and the Pakistan earthquake last month.
The gravity tractor method is feasible if the threatening asteroid is detected early enough and at a sufficient distance from Earth. Based on calculations, it’s theorized that a 20 ton spacecraft could sufficiently deflect a typical 200 meter in diameter asteroid if given a lead time of 20 years. Deflecting a larger asteroid would require a spacecraft of greater mass or more lead time.
Whatever methods are employed to divert the trajectory of asteroids, early detection and better understanding of the objects are critical. That’s why there is great interest in funding increased efforts to explore known Near-Earth Orbit objects and search for presently undetected NEO objects.
That's kind of what I suspected.
We currently have nothing with the power to move large asteroids a sufficient distance anywhere near the earth, and no propulsion systems which could get way out (say, orbit of Mars) to take the long slow approach.
I think the price estimate of a few hundreds of millions of dollars are realistic for startup costs rather than hardware in orbit.
Moving a 200 meter diameter asteroid is a major effort unless its done millions of miles out. Even then you would need a craft that could accelerate to the asteroid, slow down and reverse course to match orbit, and then effect a change in the asteroid's orbit. And after that, hopefully slow down enough to return to earth at less than asteroid speeds.
I don't think we have the propulsion systems for this yet. And I don't think we are going to develop and launch it for a few hundred million dollars.
But we should be working on such a system whatever the cost. A craft that could do that could do a lot of other important things as well.
Hmmmm...I hadn't thought about up-time of the spacecraft. Twenty years is a long time to keep something running continuously with no maintenance in a very hostile environment.
|
And we'll just tx the crap out of people to pay for these dumb idea's, right? Of course, we'll need Al- Gore to make a "documentry" a few years in advance to sell the idea, cause a panic, and get the sheeple to wllingly give you their money.
cant we just build a really cool laser? it would be more fun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.