I’ve often wondered what it is about a certain stretchy, moisture wicking fabric that turns otherwise decent people into petty little twerps at the mere sight of another person wearing it. It’s functional people. Those people aren’t wearing tight stretchy shorts to look cool or irritate you. They provide padding, moisture control and coolness. You don't have to be a talented athlete to benefit. Any fat slob can have a more comfortable ride in cycling shorts than a pair of Zubas. I’m sorry the sight of a pair of shorts bothers you all so much. On second thought, I’m not sorry at all. If you are offended, or somehow annoyed, by stretchy shorts, go bite yourself!
Yup, it's a world of difference, especially in Summer- Better than naked. But there are those who act like it is not only a law that someone wears it, but what BRAND it is, and if it is "correct" enough. So I meet them all halfway...Generic black shorts and Specialized jerseys to match the bike. Which of course, does not impress the Trek riders, etc.
My wife and riding buddy (Trek fan) teased me for getting branded anything..."You are such a GIRL about it!", etc.
It depends. Sometimes after Work, I WANT to spend that five extra minutes riding, and if it is not too hot, I'll just jump on and go for a quick ride. For a longer trail ride, though, it's comfort first. Including the cutsie Specialized shoes...
There is a clear correlation between the really bright colored full-body coordinated spandex cycling outfits with the manufacturer and team logos all over them and the behavior of the cyclist in question.
Perhaps the exhibitionism inherent in looking like a rolling billboard bleeds over into riding like one owns the road.