Because you are ignoring basic science.
The internal combustion engine provides power by the expansion of the intake mixture to the exhaust mixture. This is accomplished by primarily 3 methods.
1) The breaking down of complex dense molecules into less dense molecules.
2) The vaporization of relatively dense liquid fuel into less dense vapor.
3) The expansion of gases due to heat:
#1 is the same regardless of starting with a vapor or liquid droplets.
#2 is eliminated from from your claim, producing less work.
#3 is unchanged. It is still the same chemical reaction regardless whether you start from a vapor or a liquid. It may goes faster, but that does not produce more energy and the internal combustion engine works more efficiently with a steady fast burn over and explosion.
If you first heat the intake mixture, then the delta T of #3 has a lower ratio to the exhaust, providing less expansion and consequently less work.
Which is the reason Drag Racers used to cool their fuel by running the line through ice water prior the carburetor. Also, many of the drag racing records get set in winter because of the cooler temps of the intake air, resulting in a higher ratio of expansion.
thanks for the info...I think you are missing something though. When the gas is made into a fine vapor via much heat you are getting an expansion of it and thereby more volume. That's where the added mpg's are coming about. Is that not true? I found a story of a man on one of the mpg's site whose fuel pump was malfunctioning and overheating, causing the fuel to heat up. He was getting about 45 mpg's when he was normally getting about 23. If you really look into it, heat vaporization does work...but the oil companies have made it difficult by reformulating the gas to a very high vapor temperature.