Now I'm really confused. Are the pro-BP agents arguing that Davila is NOT a drug runner who left a van with a million dollars in marijuana, beat up a BP agent, pointed a gun at them, and then ran off to mexico?
It's really frustrating discussing this, because whenever you get close to pinning down a story, the story changes again.
What is it? Did they righteously shoot a drug dealer, or is Davila a random mexican PRETENDING to be the guy they confronted just to get them in trouble?
I have seen no indication that either man argued at trial that Davila was NOT the man involved on that day.
I think all the pro-BP agent people should get together and get their story straight. Then you can post your definitive "This is what we beleive really happened", and then the rest of us can come and use the evidence to show how your story is wrong.
Right now that is impossible, because every time we point out evidence that contradicts part of the story, the supporters just change the story (which usually makes it contradict OTHER evidence). And yet the supporters can't fathom why a jury might have found the agents less than believable?
Question. When is it NOT "righteous" to shoot a drug dealer?