How the hell do you know that Mitt Romney became pro life for political expediency? Oh, that's right, you don't.
I could say the exact same thing about Ronald Reagan. You couldn't be more transparent if you tried.
Stop it. You're embarrasssing yourself.
Your rhetoric is getting tiresome, old and worn out. Especially on this issue. If you think a pro-abortion candidate, or someone who flip-flops on the abortion issue is the best man to become the GOP nomionee for 2008, then I guess you'll cast your vote for Rudy or Romney in the primary. And that is your right to do so. But don't obfuscate the issue.
>>>>>I could say the exact same thing about Ronald Reagan. You couldn't be more transparent if you tried.
Its you who is transparent. Reagan never supported abortion on demand. Nor did Reagan ever flip-flop on the abortion issue. The historic record is quite clear.
How the hell do you know that Mitt Romney became pro life for political expediency? Oh, that's right, you don't.
1994 while debating Ted the Swimmer - Romney was pro-choice to the max - said he was pro-Roe before Roe was cool.
2007 - running for the GOP nomination - Romney is pro-life.
I'm sure it's just a coincidence that his views coincide with the office he is seeking. And we're just silly to question that minor detail.