[A Citizen Reporter]

I think you are spinning things in a very weird way.

If you believe that Devlin talked to the NY Post without his attorney's consent, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell ya.

You can't believe everything the press tells you.

[Halls]

i don't believe that Devlin talked with the NYPost without his lawyers advising it! I believe his lawyers put him up to it and told him to do it.

What I think is his lawyers are going to act like they never told him that and are going to ask to get him moved based on wanting to get him away from reporters. They are playing lawyer tricks, but I think they are not educated enough to know we aren't stupid and aren't falling for it.

I'm not spinning anything in a weird way. I know exactly what is happening!

[valkyrieanne]

Why is that a "spin?" The article says that local attorneys more experienced in criminal defense are skeptical that Devlin's law firm can handle the case - not just in terms of skill and experience, but because if they take it pro bono, that means the legal firm itself has to float the expenses of depositions, expert witnesses, etc.

It is a very real fear that if the legal team messes this case up, that if guilty, Devlin could walk anyway because the case was mishandled at some point along the way, including suing his lawyers for malpractice.