Making my believeability an issue is interesting but non sequitur. This is a forum for the offering of opinions and observations which, by definition, revolve around differences in perceptions. Thus, if I reply by saying that I don't believe you, does it advance the process of rational thought or mandate that one or the other perception is real and all to the contrary are false?
I don't like many things W has done, but the only other choice was Kerry. He has a long history of undermining the troops and has a far-left voting record. W does not. A clear choice in my opinion. Cheers.