1 posted on
01/20/2007 9:10:29 AM PST by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
If Texans didn't have to take the bus, maybe a lot more Texans would gamble, and have their lives ruined by gambling.
To: Dog Gone
Won't fly. The largest part of Texas' population is within one or two hours of the Louisiana border. Texans will continue to gamble in Louisiana and feel virtuous because we don't have "that kind of thing" at home.
For the record: I am a Texan living in East Texas, I don't gamble (except for a Texas Lottery ticket a week) and don't care if we have casinos or not. I would not be interested in going to one.
10 posted on
01/20/2007 10:35:39 AM PST by
LibKill
(ENOUGH! Take the warning labels off everything and let Saint Darwin do his job.)
To: Dog Gone
It's a pot of money Texas ought to have a piece of, gambling proponents say, to help pay for educationOh, oh! Like when they promised the lottery would go into the education fund???
11 posted on
01/20/2007 10:48:28 AM PST by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: Dog Gone
help pay for education and other important services
Man do I ever get tired of the 'it's for the children' excuse. What I want to know is why gambling interests are so desperate to push casino's in states that don't have them. Here in NE they keep pushing it and pushing it--anybody have any facts that show that states that do have casino's have lower property taxes, better shools, etc..., because of the income from casino's? And that the states just don't shuffle the money around to make it look like they're benefitting from it.
14 posted on
01/20/2007 10:59:03 AM PST by
yhwhsman
("Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small..." -Sir Winston Churchill)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson