We're dissecting facts of the case, unlike yourself who swallows anything, hook,line and sinker. Care to offer any new facts instead of ad hominem attacks?
I have been "dissecting facts" of this case ever since we first learned of it. If I had only read the misleading headlines, and sob stories, I would most likely still be believing that these two agents did nothing wrong. It's through dissecting the facts that I have come to believe that these border agents aren't the angels some are making them out to be. They chose a course of action that got them into big trouble.
But like I've said, I can understand debating whether or not the punishment fit the crime.
There are no new facts that I am aware of. It will be interesting to read the trial transcripts.