Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnAmericanMother
Then Article 1 doesn't apply, and we're back where we started.
LOL!
Since you refuse to answer the question I put to you, I'll just assume that you will support the suspension of Habeas Corpus by President Hillary.
.
43 posted on 01/19/2007 12:21:44 PM PST by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: mugs99
I don't refuse to answer the question . . . it just has nothing to do with what we were talking about.

But, since you insist . . . I reject the concept of a President Hillary. The woman's a Marxist, besides which she is one of the most personally unlikeable individuals breathing. The only way she got the senate seat was due to the press running heavy cover for her (that and a hopeless excuse for an opponent). So I'm not holding my breath, might as well worry about Lyndon LaRouche getting elected dogcatcher.

If she were -- by some fluke and the inattention of the Almighty -- elected, there would be a very real possibility of civil war in this country and she probably would TRY to suspend habeas. Don't think she'd get very far with it, and it would probably trigger a constitutional crisis.

Despite all the alarmist talk by the loony libs re all the supposed civil rights violations by the Bush administration . . .

44 posted on 01/19/2007 12:31:55 PM PST by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson