Apparently the paper has an informal arrangement with their writers. One day you're a staff writer, the next you're an editor, then back to writer. Maybe editorship fluctuates as they perceive the need, so if someone complains about something, you end up complaining to the very person who wrote the piece, unknown to the complainant. I would not be surprised that such people would have an unorthodox structure. Apparently it's just an organization of racist bitchers fronting as a legitimate, professional publication.
Cash tries to sound halfway fair and rational when he puts his name to a piece. Perhaps when he wishes to take cheap shots and tell fantastic lies or make threats he hides behind "editorial"?
"Cash tries to sound halfway fair and rational when he puts his name to a piece. Perhaps when he wishes to take cheap shots and tell fantastic lies or make threats he hides behind "editorial"?"
Yes. He also seems not to like being called out regarding his racist and extortionist views and tactics. Check out this exchange b/w Cash and I (nothing bu non-answers and personal attacks):
Round 1
From Cash's letter:
"Our goal is to seek justice and truth while respecting the rights of everyone involved. We accept these cases with our eyes wide open to the evidence but with blinders on to all other distractions."
GbA to Cash:
Without question!
So, do you or do you not realize that he rightly and justifiably should be ignoring you, despite the clearly extortionist tone of your letter?
Cash to GbA:
Should you be cleaning up Army mess or something?
Round 2
From Cash's letter:
"After all, as a Democrat, just like Mike Nifong, you need the Black vote for any future political aspirations."
GbA to Cash:
Ah yes, the Democratic Party: the party of George Wallace. Did you know that Lincoln, "The Emancipator" himself, was a Republican?
When will the "African-American Community" wake up to the fact that it is -- as it has been for 40 years -- the Democratic Party's tool?
Cash to GbA:
Maybe when you wake up to the fact that the truth of this case will be determined in a court of law, not the cesspool of the blogs and message boards. Any other good questions?
Round 3
From Cash's letter:
"You have to be willing to also charge anyone else who may have committed a crime (like who went into the accuser?s bag and took the $400.00 in cash she was just paid? After careful and deliberate research of laws in at least 80 nations, including this one, we believe that that?s generally called a ROBBERY!!!)"
GbA to Cash:
Don't forget the other $1,600 she made earlier that evening taking sperm donations at the NCCU frat party, that make up the entire $2,000 Crystal claimed to have had stolen from her!
BTW, nothing perverted about that, I suppose?
Cash to GbA:
When you stop getting your erroneous information from Archie comics, maybe we'll dignify your missive with a response.
Round 4:
GbA to Cash:
Touched a few raw nerves, did I? I'd love to be able to answer your questions, but my Ebonics is weak, so please bear with me.
I am not familiar with the term "Army mess." What do you mean by it?
So, Archie has weighed-in on this too? Sheesh! Since you seem to be the authority on Crystal's ever-changing recollections, can you please tell me if there's any truth to the rumors that her next version is going to implicate Elvis, Jughead?
Truth is not determined in a Court of Law. Sadly, such outcomes are limited to the determination of guilt or not thereof, which sometimes belies truth (see: The People of California vs. Orenthal James Simpson).
Lastly, we haven't heard much lately from the Reverends Jackson and Sharpton lately on this subject. I suppose they have distanced themselves so as to limit any potential Civil liability arising from their earlier slanderous, race-baiting remarks.
By the way, is the Rainbow Coalition Scholarship/Jackpot still in play?
No response to these points from Cash (The entire exchange took place on Thursday, 4 days ago).