So you readily discount the comments of a couple of the jurors after the fact? That's cool.
Like I said, thanks for being consistent.
Why are you resorting to putting words in my mouth? Weak position, I'd guess.
Their claim of overhearing "someone" say a unanimous verdict is necessary is sketchy at best.
Like I said, thanks for being consistent.
More tactical nonsense while avoiding my question to you.
What info was kept out of court?