Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LadyNavyVet

IMHO, state insurance regulators should only ensure that the companies have adequate statutory capital to underwrite policies in their state, so that snake-oil insurance companies don't simply file bankruptcy when there are many claims to be paid. Laissez faire, buyer beware capitalism fails here because people can't be expected to become expert in analyzing insurers' financial statements.

The regulators should NOT be in the business of determining premiums, what policies can or cannot be written in a particular state, etc., however. The private market can deal with this just fine. People can then shop based upon prices and coverage while being assured that the companies will have the dough to pony up when the time comes.


79 posted on 01/18/2007 10:59:29 AM PST by dashing doofus (Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: dashing doofus

the private marke is not dealing and can not deal as long as insurance is mandatory.

You have no "down pressure" if the product is mandatory.

insurance is not a free market industry.

you can not buy a home without insurance period.

and no you can't just say sell and move because we are not a nation of illiterate dessert nomads in tents. We have homes, jobs and family which mean we don't "just move" to some nowheresville small town.


91 posted on 01/18/2007 11:32:06 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson