To: Mr. Quarterpanel
I do think that it is unfair for a company to offer Homeowners insurance in one state (or county) and not another. Do you also think it's unfair for In-N-Out Burger to only offer hamburgers in one state and not another?
143 posted on
01/18/2007 2:39:43 PM PST by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
I fail to see the relevance of your example.
Insurance is required, burgers are not.
Let us remember that insurance is regulated by the state, and that the insurance business model is unrelated to the business model of flipping meat on a piece of hot steel.
Please try to stay on the topic or on your meds.
170 posted on
01/19/2007 5:19:47 AM PST by
Mr. Quarterpanel
(I am not an actor, but I play one on TV)
To: FreedomCalls
Do you also think it's unfair for In-N-Out Burger to only offer hamburgers in one state and not another? Not a valid example. It's not whether or not the company has a presence in one state and not another, but what products it offers in one state or andother. And those products are mandated by third parties. Does In-N-Out Burger have stores in one state that has different products than in another and whose products are required by a third party? I didn't think so.
178 posted on
01/19/2007 5:51:16 AM PST by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson