[Carry_Okie]

As you might guess, I'm enjoying the hell out of this, because all the liars and fools who fell for Arnold now have to face this outstanding refutation of your bogus claims. Especially...

So, AGAIN, an oldie, but a goodie!

FO, you are going to get this post every time one of these articles comes up until you explain your support for the higher taxes this dishonest fascist you so adore is inflicting on this State.

CA: Angelides Mum on Health Care Bill (universal healthcare -- SB840)

Angelides then launched into a impassioned description of his own plan, which includes expanding health care to all children, cutting the profit margin for HMOs, requiring large companies to provide insurance for employees and then bringing "business leaders, consumers and health experts together to move California toward universal health care." Source

Gosh, that does sound familiar... Note, the clear understanding of the disastrous import of such a plan, as detailed by FareOpinion, the poster of that precient article...

Angelides is definitely for "working towards" socialized medicine, he just can't come out and say he would definitely sign this socialized medicine bill, because his focus groups told him, that most people in CA are against it.

But note the large difference between Arnold and Angelides.

This socialized medicine bill could destroy CA on its own. Source

Oh the horror!

Oh please FareOpinion, explain for us this "large difference between Arnold and Angelides."

We know you can do it.

[AmericaUnited]

You can take me off this list since I am PUBLICLY declaring what a big mistake it was to support him.

My disgust with him at this point knows no bounds. Just pathetic, absolutely pathetic! He has become just a pandering hack and publicity hound with zero scruples, going back on so much of the lying blather he served up during campaign mode.

[pogo101]

Fair enough, but it would be fairer still simply to say that Arnold has veered far to the left since his campaigning on "you pay a tax just walking down the street" radio ads. It's nice that you say you weren't fooled, but those (ads and such in 2003) were exactly right. Perhaps you are simply wiser than us fools, or perhaps you simply guessed better.

None of this changes my mind about McClintock's inability to have won in 2003's recall election, but it may make it seem wiser to have kept Gray Davis in office. I'm not sure, but it's looking less bad in comparison to the latest (and by far the most socialist) incarnation of Arnold.

[pogo101]

Oh, and please remove me from any and all ping-lists. Thanks.

[FairOpinion]

Which part of "ARNOLD VETOED THE GOVERNMENT RUN SOCIALIZED MEDICINE SINGLE PAYER BILL" Don't you understand?

The current healthcare bill may have it's good and bad points, but it's NOT the socilized medicine bill, which Kuehl wants to resurrect, by the way -- there was an article she actually wrote promoting it.