Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political Bloggers Could Be Required To Register Or Face Jail Time
Information Week. ^ | January 17 2007 | Mitch Wagner

Posted on 01/17/2007 7:36:04 PM PST by jmc1969

An outfit called GrassRootsFreedom.com is reporting that the U.S. Senate is considering legislation that would require political bloggers with readership over 500 to register as lobbyists. If they fail to register, they could face criminal penalties up to one year in jail.

"Section 220 of S. 1, the lobbying reform bill currently before the Senate, would require grassroots causes, even bloggers, who communicate to 500 or more members of the public on policy matters, to register and report quarterly to Congress the same as the big K Street lobbyists.

(Excerpt) Read more at informationweek.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: dncbrownshirts; fascist; firstamendment; pajamapeoplerule; politicalwitchhunt; shallmakenolaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last
To: jmc1969

Time to consider offshore (non-us) hosting:

http://www.google.com/search?q=offshore+anonymous+hosting&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official


41 posted on 01/17/2007 7:51:32 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
GrassRootsFreedom.com is reporting that the U.S. Senate is considering legislation that would require political bloggers with readership over 500 to register as lobbyists

Some major cognitive dissonance going on with the name and the mission... either that or... yeah... it's a smokescreen.

This bill must never pass. The freedom of the Internet must be protected, and here, I think liberal Dems would agree.

42 posted on 01/17/2007 7:52:52 PM PST by proud American in Canada ("We can, and we will prevail.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Re: #9

"You may use whatever is necessary, but I want them alive. NO DISINTEGRATIONS."


43 posted on 01/17/2007 7:53:43 PM PST by Christian4Bush (Too bad these leftist advocates for abortion didn't practice what they preached on themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
even if it does the SCOTUS will strike it down

I wouldn't bet the farm on it. The SCOTUS is almost just another branch of the Politburo.

44 posted on 01/17/2007 7:54:01 PM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
And the demoncrats accuse Republicans of taking away rights.

Welcome to the world of socialism. The demoncrats want to control free speech along with every aspect of our lives.
45 posted on 01/17/2007 7:56:41 PM PST by BMC1 (11/7/06 THE DAY WE LOST THE WAR. TERRORISTS AND THE TERRORIST LOVING DEMONCRATS ARE NOW IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Jim Robinson; Mo1
We've seen this language before a while back. I think Jim Robinson posted a thread about a similar bill in a previous life. I'll try to find it.

My guess is that as long as you aren't paid by a lobbyist for posting here, it won't apply to you. I've certainly not seen one red cent from anyone - and don't want it.

What it DOES do, if I recall correctly, is give a leg up to groups like Common Cause, AARP and other so-called "good-government" membership associations, since they are exempt from its provisions if they only contact their own members to call their Congressmen. But if you and I get together, create a new group against an issue, and pay someone to create an awareness campaign for people to call their Congressmen on a particular issue, we might unknowingly get tripped up by it.
46 posted on 01/17/2007 7:56:44 PM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Let's forget that FR is not a blog

LOL!!! I love who the media keeps misunderstanding this. They really don't get the difference between a forum and a blog.

47 posted on 01/17/2007 7:58:45 PM PST by proud American in Canada ("We can, and we will prevail.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) introduced an amendment Jan. 9 "to create criminal penalties, including up to one year in jail, if someone 'knowingly and willingly fails to file or report.'"

I'm so glad there's no reprise for someone knowingly and unwillingly failing to disclose $90K in his fridge. I mean, that would be un-cool.

48 posted on 01/17/2007 7:59:03 PM PST by txhurl (RINOS- Endanger them NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: txflake
Point taken.

But Vitter is now co-sponsoring Amendment 20, with Sen. Robert Bennett (R-Utah), to remove Section 220 from the bill, GrassRootsFreedom.com says

49 posted on 01/17/2007 8:00:48 PM PST by onyx (DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

What would happen if every conservative in the country registered as a lobbyist? The would have tens of million of forms to process and the system would crash.

(Or, they would bring in a bunch of illegal Spanish speaking employees to process them.)


50 posted on 01/17/2007 8:00:53 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:s1pcs.txt.pdf

Scrool to sectiion 220.


51 posted on 01/17/2007 8:01:56 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
Interesting line:

The term `paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying' means... [snip] ...except that such term does not include any communications by an entity directed to its members, employees, officers, or shareholders.

Translation: "None of these restrictions apply to unions."

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

52 posted on 01/17/2007 8:02:18 PM PST by Criminal Number 18F (This tagline has been laid off so the other one can get the new min. wage. It will now turn to crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
For now at least, the bill (S.1) has not passed. Sen.Gregg introduced an amendment to the bill today allowing for the Presidential line-item veto.

This infuriated the dems, who refused to allow a vote on the amendment. The Republicans retaliated by invoking cloture on S.1. The bill is stalled.

53 posted on 01/17/2007 8:03:15 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Hillary's goon squad wants to kneecap LGF and other posters who report investigative work. Whether it is genuinely Hillay's goons or other DNC operatives, the goal is clear, to silence the opposition.


54 posted on 01/17/2007 8:10:11 PM PST by weegee (The Left is worried that '24' will have the same effect as LBJ's 'Daisy' mushroom ad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: onyx
So, he wanted to make us register before he didn't want to make us register?

OR

Is this a warning to the right vis-a-vis the Fairness Doctrine? I admit I'm ignorant of the man's principles or stance.

55 posted on 01/17/2007 8:10:38 PM PST by txhurl (RINOS- Endanger them NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery


4. S.88 : A bill to increase the penalty for failure to comply with lobbying disclosure requirements.
Sponsor: Sen Vitter, David [LA] (introduced 1/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Latest Major Action: 1/4/2007 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.


17. S.AMDT.10 to S.1 To increase the penalty for failure to comply with lobbying disclosure requirements.
Sponsor: Sen Vitter, David [LA] (introduced 1/10/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 1/12/2007 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 10 as modified agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 81 - 6. Record Vote Number: 9.



S.AMDT.10
Amends: S.1 , S.AMDT.3
Sponsor: Sen Vitter, David [LA] (submitted 1/10/2007) (proposed 1/10/2007)
AMENDMENT PURPOSE:
To increase the penalty for failure to comply with lobbying disclosure requirements.

TEXT OF AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED: CR S395

STATUS:

1/10/2007:
Amendment SA 10 proposed by Senator Vitter to Amendment SA 3. (consideration: CR S323; text: CR S323)
1/11/2007:
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S415)
1/12/2007:
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S485, S489)
1/12/2007:
Amendment SA 10 as modified agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 81 - 6. Record Vote Number: 9.


http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d110:1:./temp/~bd1Hky::|/bss/d110query.html|

S.AMDT.20
Amends: S.1 , S.AMDT.3
Sponsor: Sen Bennett, Robert F. [UT] (submitted 1/10/2007) (proposed 1/11/2007)
AMENDMENT PURPOSE:
To strike a provision relating to paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying.

TEXT OF AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED: CR S400

STATUS:

1/11/2007:
Amendment SA 20 proposed by Senator Bennett to Amendment SA 3. (consideration: CR S438; text: CR S438)
1/12/2007:
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S486)
1/16/2007:
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S551)
COSPONSORS(7):

Sen McConnell, Mitch [KY] - 1/10/2007
Sen Kyl, Jon [AZ] - 1/11/2007
Sen Cornyn, John [TX] - 1/11/2007
Sen Inhofe, James M. [OK] - 1/12/2007
Sen Vitter, David [LA] - 1/12/2007
Sen Thune, John [SD] - 1/12/2007
Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] - 1/16/2007



56 posted on 01/17/2007 8:11:08 PM PST by Mo1 (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC AND DONATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: txflake

Lools like someone in the GOP leadership took him to the woodshed.


57 posted on 01/17/2007 8:11:32 PM PST by onyx (DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Yeah, yeah let me guess...

Don't put your shabby words in my mouth.

58 posted on 01/17/2007 8:12:07 PM PST by Petronski (Who am I and why am I here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

They want names so they can have Foleygate and Limbaughgate and Bennetgate scandals on all the bloggers of influence.

YOU WILL BE POLITICALLY HARASSED. After having seen the photos of swastikas and arson on Republican homes in 2004, there is no way in Hell I would let the Democrats hunt me down. They mean death.


59 posted on 01/17/2007 8:12:20 PM PST by weegee (The Left is worried that '24' will have the same effect as LBJ's 'Daisy' mushroom ad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Well, I hope everyone is happy with the Democrat leadership. Bad as the Republicans were, it's nothing to what's going to be shoved down our throats.


60 posted on 01/17/2007 8:12:32 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson