Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverhillorat
Sorry, but the Supremes have ruled that once you are in the country, a person is covered by our laws. That`s why we are keeping the terrorists we caught in Afghanistan at Gitmo and why those fleeing Castro can be sent back if they don`t touch our shores. Illegals can be deported, but, while they are in the US, they are covered. That isn`t written into the Constitution but, like so many other things, the Courts have ruled its implied.

The Supremes under the Kelo case have also ruled that we have no right to property as long as some other entity can provide more taxes to the government with the procurement of our poperty. Are they right? Does the Contitution state that we have to give our property to any private citizen that wants it because they claim to be able to provide more tax revenue?

87 posted on 01/19/2007 11:37:13 PM PST by Ajnin (Neca Eos Omnes. Deus Suos Agnoset.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Ajnin

Ok, the Supremes got one wrong,then according to your logic,every other thing they ruled on was wrong?


88 posted on 01/20/2007 7:49:34 PM PST by neverhillorat (IF THE RATS WIN, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson