Posted on 01/17/2007 4:10:59 PM PST by Mia T
ping
Keep it up Mia.
You ARE a little Hillery nuts but you do good work, thanks
Again keep digging.
(-:
ping
Let's not confuse the messenger with the message, Joe.... ;)
HILLARY ON THE COUCH
IS MISSUS CLINTON MENTALLY FIT?
Thanks Mia-keep up the good work.
I still think it will be Hillary/Obama, but I did have an interesting thought just now. If the Dems actually (really & truly) dis Hillary and look elsewhere, I wonder if Clintonista victims who have been paid off will finally start talking. I can dream.
ping
thanks :)
Honest I meant only as a comliment.
You do good work and I love it.
I think victims will be coming forward in either case.
No problem. That's how I took it. Just couldn't resist the segue. ;)
ping
Kerry in early December of 2003, according to the press, was getting few if any donations and even fewer supporters for the Democratic nomination.
Do you recall that the hot candidate for the Democratic nomination in early December of 2003 was Dr. Howard Dean. Dean you'll recall had this fantastic ability to raise huge sums of money on the INTERNET. He was the high teck candidate and certain to be the Democratic Nominee?
The media is all hype.
Hillary will be the nominee in 2008 and her running mate will not be Obama. Remember Bill in 1992? He chose a running mate that was boring and dull. There is no way either Bill or Hillary would select a running mate that could out shine them. She will have a dull booring running mate just like Bill had in 1992.
Remember Bill chose Gore because he was dull and booring and all the comparisons to Bill would be favorable to Bill.
I hope you are right.
I appreciate the article. But as you know more than most - the Clinton Mafia Machine infects and touches untold thousands of apparatchniks. Obama is a mere fly to flick...one way or another. If they can't buy him off (with a vp nomination, for instance), they will find ways to take care of him.....maybe he has a sibling that might get hit by a truck - twice - to get the message across. But I believe the CMM will be more subtle - hints here, hisses there, planted in just the right places. Obama will be a mere whiff in the wind by 2008.
Re: representation that Rasmussen polling was correct in 2000 and 2004. While Rasmussen was very good in '04, in 2000 they were terrible. Their final poll on election day had Bush ahead nationally by 10 points. How can a pollster be ten points off?
I wonder if more people are reading Mia T posts? OOPS, now I might trip over her when I'm in a local park.
Don't peak too soon, Mia. You haven't seen the miracle of Chauncey Gardner that media whoredom will do for their goddess, her lowness.
Do you think she would be forced to take a running mate with a military background?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.