Posted on 01/17/2007 11:56:49 AM PST by JZelle
That's a scathing indictment of this administration, when you consider that we are now 4 years, 3,000+ lives, and hundreds of billions of dollars into this thing.
I suspect Bush has never able to explain this because there are too many glaring holes in any explanation that is offered for it.
The problem in Washington isn't that there are "Boneless Wonders," but that an @sshole like Bill Kristol is typical of the folks who think they've actually got a backbone.
Based on that, GWB is found to be a poor excuse for a Conservative and a sub-par Republican at that.
You wrote:
"our leaders are the worst of the worst generation in American history."
Amen to that. It's because we have a system that promotes politicians on their ability to raise money and nothing else.
Okay, I know a bit of Vietnamese, some Russian and a smattering of English, even a tiny bit of high school Latin, but this one has me stumped -
He was "sui generis"
It sounds like French or something you'd use to clean insects off the windshield.
Someone help me out please.
I know that the msm here and in Canada are firmly in the enemy camp, but the fact that you are here on FR likely means that you have access to truthful dialogue and facts. Have you missed Oil for Food, saddam training terrorists, al-queda in Iraq, the wmd and programs found, wmd transported to syria, any of the documents translated by jveritas and others here?
What I would like an explanation of is why it took him three years to figure out we didn't have enough troops in Iraq to deal with an insurgency and we needed to secure Baghdad. And why he hasn't increased the size of the Army and Marine Corps before now. I saw today the two year total deployment limit on National Guard and Reserve units is being lifted. The troops are magnificent, but can't take much more of this tempo of deployments. And the tactics. We know "catch and release" doesn't work and have known since Vietnam that search and destroy doesn't work unless you follow it up with a hold phase.
Rant over.
Moot point given that the current administration seems unable to do either.
He is walking a fine line, trying to keep our islamic "allies", especially a nuclear pakistan, in our camp without alienating the growing governments in iraq and afghanistan. Trying to drag a whole culture into the 21st century without literally destroying them, as we did with Japan, is a daunting task.
I know. Sad isn't it.
It's a fool's errand.
It could only be attempted by liberals who believe so many false things about human nature that it's a wonder they don't choke.
I was thinking that maybe I'd like to reincarnate on some planet really far from here.
I agree. But with this level of public support, he won't be able to sustain the Iraq operation much longer. People are screaming about 20,000 more troops, which might not be enough IMHO, which wouldn't have been a problem, one, two or three years ago.
1. The establishment of an Islamic state -- and a Marxist one at that -- in the Middle East.
2. A "9/11 commission" whose sole purpose was covering up the incompetence and outright malfeasance of this country's government (on both sides of the political aisle) in protecting its own citizenry over the last 10-15 years.
3. (Related to #2) A deplorable slap on the wrist for former national security advisor Sandy Berger, who committed egregious Federal crimes for the sole purpose of covering up the incompetence and malfeasance of himself and his former employers.
4. An open-borders policy that allows nearly unfettered immigration from countries all over the world -- including about 100,000 visitors/immigrants from Islamic countries in the Middle East that have been havens for terrorists for years.
Please wake me up when this starts to make any sense to you.
What I would like an explanation of is why it took him three years to figure out we didn't have enough troops in Iraq to deal with an insurgency and we needed to secure Baghdad.
I gave you the explanation above. Iraq is not -- and never has been -- part of any stupid "war on terror" at all. It was a silly, utopian nation-building effort carried out by big-government globalists in the U.S. government.
Rant over.
the formula requires the man and the circumstances.
hockey... gretsky....the great one... had to quit hockey prematurely after Edmonton as was no longer a star without his team to work with and work for. the circumstances are the other component.
Lady Astor: "Winston, if I were your wife I'd put poison in your coffee."
Winston Churchill: "Nancy, if I were your husband I'd drink it."
See #57.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.