Replies

There are some spinners out there trying to pull the wool over peoples eyes,somehow trying to convince them that a pro abortion pro gay candidate is the best way to go in order to get pro life judges etc. Makes absolutely no sense at all.

No, the Republican candidate who happens to have the best chance to beat Hillary, Obama, or any other Democrat and has the best chance to win the presidency happens to be pro-abortion and a gay sympathizer. What doesn't make any sense is why would anyone think that this is trying to pull the wool over anyone's eyes.

Victoria, I regret the way I spoke to you earlier.Sorry, I should have been able to discuss more calmly (mind you I did not call anyone a fool or troll,but that`s beside the point :) ).For the record I did not mean YOU where spinning, I meant the people that started this theory that a pro abortion/gay candidate is the only person that can win.It seems that maybe Hannity is with you as well.

The other thing is this,more importantly.....Why would anyone want to vote for a man that says he holds DEEP BELIEFS on pro gay/abortion issues.If he believes so deeply in these as he says,then how can he possibly turn around and name judges to the high court that hold opposing views.Where are his principals? Or does he really give a hoot either way?

Lets say Rudy is the guy who gets the nod,there will be a debate,the question will be asked by the liberal moderator,Why Sir are you going to appoint conservative judges to the bench when you hold such different views.This will be a huge story in itself.

He is not going to win it IMHO anyway,nor is McCain.I would prefer a Brownback or Hunter.Mit Romney at least claims to have converted,I am skeptical.If Rudy claimed to have had a change of heart on these issues, then he MIGHT be viewed differently.

I am disappointed in Brownback but have not quite written him off yet.