Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Victoria Delsoul
Victoria,for your information....there is a very good chance that Roe V Wade may be overturned with one more conservative judge.2 more judges and it will be almost certain.

Electing Rudy (or any pro abortion candidate) who is pro gay/pro abortion is not the way to go.

I don't think you should accuse people of being either a troll or a fool if they want a pro life president. I think a apology is in order,but after reading your LONG post,I highly doubt I will get one.A apology to the thousands on this site that agree with me,might be in order as well.
319 posted on 01/22/2007 8:08:23 AM PST by thepresidentsbestfriend (SAM BROWNBACK FOR PRESIDENT or Hunter . Only thing worse than a Democrat,is a moderate Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]


To: thepresidentsbestfriend
I don't think you should accuse people of being either a troll or a fool if they want a pro life president

Oh, you are remarkable!


Read what you wrote:

We need to do what`s right. If the candidate for the GOP is not pro life, then it would be better for Dems to win.

Get that? You posted that it would be better for the Democrats to win if the GOP candidate isn't pro-life.

I must not have been clear in my original post, so I will clarify it for you:

A pro-life President can't overturn Roe vs Wade, but he can appoint judges in the mold of Scalia and Alito just like RUDY HAS SAID HE WOULD. Isn't this what we want? Don't we have a better chance to further our pro-life agenda by electing a Republican President who says he will appoint originalist judges instead of a Democrat President like Hillary or Obama, who you will enable by supporting a losing GOP candidate who can't win squat?

How is a pro-life President going to fight abortion? Abortion is already legal and that won't change anytime soon. The way to fight it is by incremental steps, like appointing judges who will judge on the side of life. Another step is by reaching out to people through education and by teaching our children the facts at school, by opposing to partial birth abortion, by allowing parental notification, by eliminating federal funding for abortion, and by opposing embryonic cell-steam research. The Democrats are OPPOSED to all of this.

If Giuliani says he would do these things, as well as appoint constitutional originalist judges like Scalia and Alito (which he already said he would do,) you still wouldn't vote for him because he isn't pro-life, even though he would do the same things a pro-life president would do. And in that case, I can fairly assume “the thousands on this site that agree with you” as you put it, would also agree that it would be better for a Democrat candidate who is opposed to all the above to win the presidency if the GOP nominates a candidate who isn't pro-life.

Do you think I will apologize to those who will let Democrats win, and who let those who disregard our most cherished values - liberty, freedom, and the pursuit of happiness – gain political power? Well, think again.

324 posted on 01/22/2007 6:49:32 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson