Like hell! What is with you Gingrich people when you should realize how unpopular he is and that he is permanently damaged due to his indescretions. He is NOT conservative on morals. He is damaged due to his hypocrisy and how intelligent was it of him to be screwing the secretary during the whole Clintoon-Lewinsky mess? He may know his stuff on most conservative matters and is effective in speaking but he is not one to put up as the nominee. Why not get someone as good as Duncan Hunter, who can back up his conservative principles on ALL fronts?
What is with you Gingrich people when you should realize how unpopular he is and that he is permanently damaged due to his indescretions.
-------
First, Newt is not unpopular with conservatives, in the majority. Forget morals - if they were a measurement criteria for the Presidency, we would not have had FDR, Eisenhower, Reagan and many others. We also would not have suffered the Clinton dark period for this country either if morals mattered.
Show me a more patriotic, knowledgeable, experienced CONSERVATIVE (in all ways important to America) with GUTS to face the scummy, slimebag Socialists that are trying to turn America into another France....then I will support that candidate.
At least Newt is in the top ratings as electable...who is Duncan Hunter, voters will ask...to win in 2008 it is going to take a STRONG FIGHTER and I do not see one, except for Newt who will stand up to the sleaze and criminality of the left and the rotten MSM.
I'll gladly vote for Hunter if he can get the nomination, but I think Newt has a more realistic chance of doing so.
I won't vote for Giuliani under any circumstances, and probably will not vote for McCain or Romney, either.