Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s first blunder
The Hill ^ | 1/17/07 | Dick Morris

Posted on 01/17/2007 6:46:53 AM PST by mathprof

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 01/17/2007 6:46:54 AM PST by mathprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mathprof

How about wives working as or for lobbyists?

Of course, the PC police would never allow that to be questioned, but it seems like a much more serious loophole.


2 posted on 01/17/2007 6:48:50 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
"Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), who opposes wives cashing in on their husbands’ positions..."


3 posted on 01/17/2007 6:48:56 AM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), who opposes wives cashing in on their husbands’ positions

Didn't she cash in on her own husband's position when she ran for the senate?

4 posted on 01/17/2007 6:50:24 AM PST by Schnucki ("When a mullah calls, an undertaker is sure to follow." -- old Persian saying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), who opposes wives cashing in on their husbands’ positions..."

That is a tounge in cheek comment if I ever heard one.

5 posted on 01/17/2007 6:50:31 AM PST by NeoCaveman (As opposed to a foot in mouth quote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), who opposes wives cashing in on their husbands’ positions..."

LOL! Yes, we all know that Hillary would never want to cash in on her husband's positions... (Double entendre intended)

6 posted on 01/17/2007 6:50:43 AM PST by TommyDale (If we don't put a stop to this global warming, we will all be dead in 10,000 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Just damn!


7 posted on 01/17/2007 6:50:56 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
How about wives working as or for lobbyists?

Wives, children, etc. working for lobbyists. They'd never change that because that's how the bribes actually work.

8 posted on 01/17/2007 6:51:49 AM PST by NeoCaveman (show me the money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
Obama has screwed up.

Here's to more.

9 posted on 01/17/2007 6:52:35 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Like using AirForceOne to bring your husband in for campaign stops?


10 posted on 01/17/2007 6:52:51 AM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Hillary doesn't have a chance. Obamamania is in full swing. And he is the only candidate for whom she does not have an FBI file.


11 posted on 01/17/2007 6:52:52 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

"Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), who opposes wives cashing in on their husbands’ positions, voted righteously in favor of the reform and will probably use the Illinois senator’s vote against him in the presidential primaries."

Oh, the irony! Mrs. Bill Clinton wouldn't be a Senator if it weren't for her husband's "position"!


12 posted on 01/17/2007 6:53:30 AM PST by CarolinaGOP ("Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face." - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
All Obama has to do is mention Bill Clinton's name and it will sink any argument Hellary tried to make
13 posted on 01/17/2007 6:54:33 AM PST by Mo1 (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC AND DONATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

The point of this article is that Morris is pitching his services to become Osama Obama's political advisor.


14 posted on 01/17/2007 6:56:33 AM PST by peyton randolph (What we have done for others and the world remains and is immortal - Albert Pike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Hillary doesn't have a chance.

GHWB

then WJC

then WJC

then GWB

then GWB

then HRC?

then HRC?

then Jeb?

Keeping it all in the 'family', you know.

15 posted on 01/17/2007 6:58:38 AM PST by houeto (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
The point of this article is that Morris is pitching his services to become Osama Obama's political advisor.

And here I thought it was Morris trying to get on Missus Clinton's good side, and payroll.

16 posted on 01/17/2007 7:00:34 AM PST by NeoCaveman (he wants to be shown the money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
And here I thought it was Morris trying to get on Missus Clinton's good side, and payroll.
Morris would do it at the drop of a hat but he knows the Clinton cabal no longer trusts him, i.e. he rides the Osama Obama bandwagon or gets left out in the cold.
17 posted on 01/17/2007 7:02:43 AM PST by peyton randolph (What we have done for others and the world remains and is immortal - Albert Pike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: montag813
****Obamamania is in full swing. And he is the only candidate for whom she does not have an FBI file.*****

Here, maybe you should double check.
Filegate name list


(IMHO, This FBI File nonsense should stop. It makes FReepers look like moonbats. There's no 'there', 'there'.)

18 posted on 01/17/2007 7:02:53 AM PST by Condor51 (The demoncRATs don't want another 'Vietnam' - they want another Dien Bien Phu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

I suppose he is pretending to be honest. Yeah right. Hillary is using Bill. We know that and they know that. Of course, none of our congress people are going to stand on ethics. That wouldn't be right because they don't have any concept of what eithics is.


19 posted on 01/17/2007 7:02:57 AM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Not sure what's best, but spouses are put on staff because they can be trusted completely, and they're doing the work
--and much more-- anyway.


20 posted on 01/17/2007 7:03:11 AM PST by chiller (Old Media is not yet dead. Turn them off and they will die. For the sake of sanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson