Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wii-contest radio station fires 10 staff [re: CA woman who died of water intoxication]
GameSpot UK ^ | Jan. 17, 2007 | Emma Boyes

Posted on 01/17/2007 5:33:52 AM PST by SpringheelJack

A California radio station has fired 10 employees, including five on-air personalities, after Jennifer Strange, a mother of three, died following her participation in a 'Hold your wee for a Wii' competition, reports the Sacramento Bee. The 28-year-old died of water intoxication having consumed an estimated two gallons of water in an attempt to win a Nintendo console for her children. The winner of the contest was to be the person who managed to drink the most water without going to the bathroom.

Strange called into her office after the show and told a co-worker that she had a "really bad" headache and would be going straight home. She was found dead in her Rancho Cordova home on Friday afternoon by her mother, who had gone to check on her after being contacted by the concerned co-worker.

The DJs had made comments joking about people dying from water intoxication during the show, according to the Sacramento Bee. There was even a discussion about a "poor kid in college"--presumably Matthew Carrington, who also died from water intoxication after a fraternity hazing ritual. One person dismissed the link by saying, "Yeah, well, he was doing other things." During the show, one DJ also admitted, "Maybe we should have researched this."

Two hours in to the contest, a female caller, who identified herself as Eva, phoned in to warn the radio station that drinking too much water can kill. She said, "Those people that are drinking all that water can get sick and possibly die from water intoxication." One DJ replied, "We are aware of that," while another added, "They signed releases, so we're not responsible. It's ok."

Twenty contestants took part in the competition, including Strange, who was the runner-up. Other participants said that they became concerned when one woman lay on the ground, with her teeth chattering, and looking pale. At one point Strange was lying on the ground, but told staff that she "could probably drink more" if someone could pick her up.

Despite the sackings, the Sacramento County Sheriff John McGinness said that there would not be a criminal investigation. He said, "It's not as if she was somehow in their custody and they had a role to care for her. Rather, it was an invitation to a contest that was clearly ill-advised. She was exercising her free will."

A notice on the radio station's Web site stated that an investigation was underway. It reads, "First and foremost, our thoughts and sympathies go out to Jennifer's family and loved ones. I also want to assure you that the circumstances regarding this matter are being examined as thoroughly as possible. We are doing everything we can to deal with this difficult situation in a manner that is both respectful and responsible."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: waterintoxication
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: thulldud

Yep .. and they will win this case


21 posted on 01/17/2007 5:50:47 AM PST by Mo1 (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC AND DONATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack
"They signed releases, so we're not responsible. It's ok."

Dozens of Sacramento area lawyers are rubbing their hands and saying, "Wanna bet?"

22 posted on 01/17/2007 5:51:21 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eyes Unclouded

Not necessarily. I am sure you have read in court decisions when prenups were thrown out, this can be too.


23 posted on 01/17/2007 5:52:07 AM PST by WV Mountain Mama (2007 resolution: learn how to rail a berm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack
Two hours in to the contest, a female caller, who identified herself as Eva, phoned in to warn the radio station that drinking too much water can kill. She said, "Those people that are drinking all that water can get sick and possibly die from water intoxication." One DJ replied, "We are aware of that," while another added, "They signed releases, so we're not responsible. It's ok."

Criminal charges please.

24 posted on 01/17/2007 5:53:25 AM PST by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomson

"There's something so tragic about someone's life sold for so cheap while onlookers laugh."

No doubt. There are some many other horrific things going on that this doesn't quite seem to compare.


25 posted on 01/17/2007 5:54:39 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
I'm not a lawyer either -- I just work for them, and they aren't criminal lawyers. But it seems to me, from what the Sheriff said...that no one put a gun to her head and forced her to drink all that water...there doesn't look like criminal liability here.

Putting a gun to someone's head is not an element an involuntary manslaughter. The question probably comes down to whether it was the employees actions that caused the death or was it the actions of the individual. The employees created the environment for the action to occur, but since it was not their actions directly that resulted in the death they may be off the hook. If a DA wanted to, he could probably persue a case.

26 posted on 01/17/2007 5:56:28 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Perhaps they should have dumped in each gallon a bottle of that pedialyte stuff?

A guy told me he worked at a n-plant in Canada. Gatorade was provided in his area because of the heat and high water consumption.

27 posted on 01/17/2007 5:58:27 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

On the books here there is the offence of "Criminal negligence causing death or grievous bodily harm". It most often comes up in motor vehicle accidents, but basically it applies when one can reasonably foresee that a course of action could be fatal. I'm pretty sure that there are similar laws in other jurisdictions.


28 posted on 01/17/2007 6:00:11 AM PST by Squawk 8888 (Pluto's been marginalized! Call the ACLU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WV Mountain Mama; DB
I'm not familiar with contract law but it seems to me that this women did something dumb on her own with other people goading her on. Is that anything that the station can be held responsible for? Wasn't she a nurse? She would have known too much water is bad... I mean they ALL should have known better
29 posted on 01/17/2007 6:01:26 AM PST by Eyes Unclouded (We won't ever free our guns but be sure we'll let them triggers go....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack

Maybe I'm just insensitive but it sounds to me like there were 11 idiots involved in this escapade,10 at the radio station and 1 who killed herself for a stinking NINTENDO,pitiful !!!


30 posted on 01/17/2007 6:04:48 AM PST by Obie Wan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack

If stupidity were illegal in this country about half the population would be behind bars and every state Capitol building would be a maximum security prison.


31 posted on 01/17/2007 6:07:22 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Actually it makes perfect sense to me. Anything you drink in excess is bad for you. Whether it is alcoholic drinks or not


32 posted on 01/17/2007 6:11:49 AM PST by Kaslin (In war, there are two exit strategies. One is called victory. The other is called defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack
Sacramento County Sheriff John McGinness said that there would not be a criminal investigation. He said, "It's not as if she was somehow in their custody and they had a role to care for her. Rather, it was an invitation to a contest that was clearly ill-advised. She was exercising her free will."

White girl.

33 posted on 01/17/2007 6:15:50 AM PST by subterfuge (Today, Tolerance =greatest virtue;Hypocrisy=worst character defect; Discrimination =worst atrocity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

IMHO, it's the people who are calling for the radio station people to be charged for the actions of this woman that are the real problem with this country. No one wants to take responsibility for their own actions anymore.

Sadly, on this suppoedly conservative/libertarian site, Eyes Unclouded seems to be the only one who understands this........

34 posted on 01/17/2007 6:15:55 AM PST by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
If stupidity were illegal in this country about half the population would be behind bars and every state Capitol building would be a maximum security prison.

Thornton Wilder has a great line in "The Matchmaker" which pretty well sums things up: "Ninty percent of the people in this world are fools, and the rest of us are in great danger of contamination."

35 posted on 01/17/2007 6:15:56 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Eyes Unclouded

I would think that if the people running the contest were aware of what could go wrong and did not disclose it to the contestants it would be a problem. People familiar with the illness called in and were rebuffed, and the article states that when contestants showed symptoms of illness, nothing was done to either help them or stop the contest. Also, since the station people knew the potential problems, the contestants should have been monitored for a period of time afterward to make sure there were no problems.

If you hold a contest and know of possible health risks, it is up to you to disclose the risks and to offer aid to the participants should they occur. My husband races dirt bikes, we sign waivers to get into the race, but they supply an ambulance and medical team in case anything goes wrong. I believe that will be the difference. The station knowing a possible risk, not making sure there was medical aid and perhaps not even disclosing the concern to the participants.


36 posted on 01/17/2007 6:17:37 AM PST by WV Mountain Mama (2007 resolution: learn how to rail a berm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
As God as my witness, I thought water was safe

And turkeys could fly

37 posted on 01/17/2007 6:20:21 AM PST by trad_anglican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WV Mountain Mama
I hadn't read about that until now. Yea your right that is bad. Telling the callers off, laughing, and not being (or at least giving the appearance) of concern will sink the station. How far up do these kind of gimmicks go? Some mid level people probably only.. can the whole station be held for this or just that show and its people?

PS: FR should have a warning about the dangers of posting without reading details.
38 posted on 01/17/2007 6:24:23 AM PST by Eyes Unclouded (We won't ever free our guns but be sure we'll let them triggers go....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack
Another victim of the dreaded DIHYDROGEN MONOXIDE
39 posted on 01/17/2007 6:24:34 AM PST by Alouette (Learned Mother of Zion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WV Mountain Mama
.....agreed.....

.....and may i add.....

.....well said.....

.....in todays' "I'll Sue!" climate.....

.....the idiots that held this contest.....

.....will never work "on air" ever again.....

40 posted on 01/17/2007 6:24:35 AM PST by cyberaxe (((.....does this mean I'm kewl now?.....)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson