Just another case of the left making sure they don't risk ticking of the Jihadist by being insensitive.
Posted on 01/16/2007 8:10:48 PM PST by txroadkill
He has Our Lady of Guadaloupe on his inside left forearm and some kind of runes that look like a bar code on his right.
love 24--bookmark
Just another case of the left making sure they don't risk ticking of the Jihadist by being insensitive.
http://desight.img.jugem.jp/20060412_163381.jpg
http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g36/montyboosh/kiefer_sutherland_09.jpg
Basically saying it's all a Bush lie."
Show them that in May of 2004, the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency would not let the United States remove...
500 Tons of Uranium in Iraq!
Wonder how much coverage CNN gave the Australian plot story? Not that I ever watch CNN, but have no memory of the incident. Thanks for the reminder.
Do you think these same people minded in '64 when LBJ ran his nuclear ad to scare people away from voting for Goldwater? I guess the thinking then was that any nuke would have been launched by the USSR, so that wouldn't have been ethnically insensitive. Bombing, ok. Insensitivity, bad.
FReegards,
DocRock
Liberals panties are in a bunch because their show "Commander in Chief aka Hillary in the Whitehouse" bombed in the ratings.
I mean honestly this is a wet dream for the CNN/NewReeks/Cindy Sheehan crowd. This is exactly what they want to happen!
"24" shows terrorists being treated precisely as they deserve - shot in the knees, fingers being broken, summary execution of traitors. If this scares Islamists and liberals, that's an added benefit.
Regards, Ivan
I'm marrying a girl with a general similarity in preferences to those you describe.
I thank God for her every day.
You do realize "Jack" is about 5-3, don't you?
:P
Right... CNN would have said the same thing on September 10, 2001. This is very real, and the libs are thinking 2008.
The loathesome Keith Olbermann had a similar segment on his show.
ping
I found it unbeleivable that the US would knowingly condemn one of it's most effective agents to death by turning him over to a criminal terrorist as blackmail ransom. Sorry, I just don't see that happening.
Then, I found it unbeleivable that the US would agree to the terms of this same terrorist after he had been proven a liar by releasing 100+ captured terrorists.
That lacked much credibility with me, but, if the screenplay were half done by liberals, it may make some sense.
Also, the President's sister needs to be medicated and turned loose on palm fronds aspiring to become baskets.
TV stars do that. But we are not proposing to cavort with Kiefer Sutherland; we want to do it with faithful true-hearted dead-eye Jack, which is a wholly different prospect.
Libs live in a fantasy world.....of ignorance.
Is he? I am surprised....but if true, I'm glad he lost the Golden Globe.
i've done ten at a time... (with breaks for food, WC, other necessities ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
