Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant

>> I suspect that Olmert leaked that thinking that it would prompt Iran to change course and give up it's nukes.

Or, more likely, Olmert broadcast the move so that Iran WOULD move their nuke material to safer digs. Then when a military strike on the old site fails to accomplish anything, Olmert and the peaceniks can claim that there is no military solution and that Israel will just have to compromise.


11 posted on 01/16/2007 10:52:14 AM PST by vikingd00d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: vikingd00d

Or more likely, to move them is to bring them out into the open where our satellites can find and target them.


19 posted on 01/16/2007 10:57:43 AM PST by stm (Believe 1% of what you hear in the drive-by media and take half of that with a grain of salt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: vikingd00d

what would make more sense would be to broaden the bombing campaign. REMOVE their infrastructure tha gives them the ability to work on such old destructive, dirty technologies.

maybe something along the lines of hiroshima style....relatively massive and crushing... cuzz sure as sunday, they will continue to return to weapons construction.

they already are in the stone age, but our oil bucks have given them the ability to buy old $hit technology which they indend to use

Israel and the West HAVE to get away from political correctness and play on the same playing field that the mullahs are on.

would the mullahs precision bomb tel aviv?


25 posted on 01/16/2007 11:07:09 AM PST by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson