Ah, but you're asking the wrong question. Do you think he'd find those women any more attractive if they were 20 years older if they weren't tattooed? Why is it the anti-tat nazis like to pretend that only those with tattoos age?
"Anti-tat nazis"? Awesome command of the language, dude. You like tattoos, right? That's great. Have as many as you want, it's your body, do what you want to with it. To each, their own. That's about as "nazi" as I'm going to get.
To answer your question? I don't know what he'd think. I can only speak for myself, but I don't even put bumper stickers on my truck or wear t-shirts with some company's name or logo.
Decades later, I would find them more attractive without the Rorschach Inkblot "guess what it used to be?" tattoo(s), especially when I'm comparing them with other 40 or 50 year olds without tats...or younger women who are also completing for men's attention.
I've seen some nice tattoos and have dated women with and without. I would not avoid a woman simply because she had a tattoo, but I don't see them as an enhancement. To me, they are more like self inflicted damage, like body piercings, or that the person was prone to following fads. Tattoos have been around forever, but their popularity changes with the times. If those thoughts make me a "anti-tat nazi", sieg heil.