Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freespirited

This is a slam-dunk for the Feds if they want it.

Any of you legal-eagles out there: Is there any reason why the Feds would NOT want to take action in this case?


17 posted on 01/16/2007 10:50:52 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy

Do you think it is "possible" that state law takes precedence in this matter? I do.. It's got to grind through the state.


77 posted on 01/16/2007 1:41:21 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy
Is there any reason why the Feds would NOT want to take action in this case?

I'll take a shot. Because they are wimps?

I'd use harsher language but I don't want to get banned.

164 posted on 01/16/2007 3:50:27 PM PST by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy
Is there any reason why the Feds would NOT want to take action in this case?

Not a legal eagle...but the Feds will not take a position so long as there is a criminal case pending. They won't jeopardize due process.

They will also wait to see what action the state bar -- and the state -- might take. They have primary jurisdiction.

At some point, though, the case will be dropped. And if Nifong's ass isn't put through a legal wringer by all concerned, it will be a gross miscarriage of justice.

305 posted on 01/16/2007 9:15:09 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson