Skip to comments.
Warnings of warming 'refined'
Waterbury Republican-American ^
| January 16, 2007
| Editorial
Posted on 01/16/2007 8:48:34 AM PST by Graybeard58
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: Graybeard58; nmh; elkfersupper; DCPatriot; traviskicks; Gene Eric; Captain Marvell; ChessExpert; ...
Ping to a Republican-American Editorial.
If you want on or off this ping list, let me know.
2
posted on
01/16/2007 8:49:45 AM PST
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Graybeard58; redpoll; Diana in Wisconsin; mosquewatch.com; litehaus; gogogodzilla; ...
Ping to a Republican-American Editorial.
If you want on or off this ping list, let me know.
3
posted on
01/16/2007 8:50:48 AM PST
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Graybeard58
It's Global Warming all the way up to 14 degrees this morning in Oklahoma.
And allot of that Global Warming is still stuck to the tree limbs and powerlines.
4
posted on
01/16/2007 8:52:46 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: Graybeard58
5
posted on
01/16/2007 8:54:26 AM PST
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: Graybeard58
I'm still waiting for them to explain the expanding glaciers.
Where do ice ages come from again? Global warming?
To: Graybeard58
7
posted on
01/16/2007 8:56:54 AM PST
by
N2Gems
To: Graybeard58
8
posted on
01/16/2007 8:57:18 AM PST
by
Zeppelin
(Keep on FReepin' on...)
To: Graybeard58
Waterbury Warmists Warming Warnings Waning.
9
posted on
01/16/2007 8:59:12 AM PST
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Graybeard58
The entire controversy over man made global warming has become so polarized (no pun intended) and politicized that its proponents are dug into an enormous credibility chasm. If they're serious about this allegedly desperate situation, they need to make some effort to legitimize their position by divorcing it from partisanship. Of course, they won't because they can't. For some odd reason, CO2 generated by socialist countries doesn't seem to be harming the environment.
10
posted on
01/16/2007 8:59:42 AM PST
by
Spok
To: TomGuy
I had to shovel about three inches of global warming out of my driveway this morning.
11
posted on
01/16/2007 9:00:12 AM PST
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Graybeard58
At the present rate, it would be more than 9,000 years before CO2 reached 1 percent. Al Gore must be spinning in his grave.
12
posted on
01/16/2007 9:01:03 AM PST
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Graybeard58
Just a thought, from about 1830 until about 1940 the USA burned mostly coal as fuel for the industrial engine of the country and any change in climate temperature doesn't seem to be noted. Wouldn't you think that all the resulting emissions for that period would have had an effect? and wouldn't that effect been changed by the emission restrictions introduced since?
Just wondering.
To: Graybeard58
In San Antonio today, it's 30 with freezing rain, snowing in Houston and Kerrville, and nobody - I mean nobody - is talking about global warming.
14
posted on
01/16/2007 9:02:26 AM PST
by
Froufrou
To: Graybeard58
Liberal global warming gameplan: if any evidence contradicts our viewpoint, immediately move goalposts.
To: TomGuy
We have slabs of global warming all over our sidestreets and alleys, with bone-jarring ruts in it. I guess we'll have to host a global warming conference or we'll never get enough hot air together to melt the stuff.
To: TomGuy
It's Global Warming all the way up to 14 degrees this morning in Oklahoma. Go for a drive. Your vehicle emissions should be enough to raise the temp into the mid-60's by this afternoon (unless you drive an SUV, which would push the thermometer well above 100 degrees within hours).
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: Graybeard58
Those numbers are meaningless without context Accuracy means little to weak-minded Americans who subscribe to the rantings of Al "the boob" Gore.
To: Graybeard58
U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) It's the UN and an NGO. The UN itself is an NGO. That it contains the word 'governmental' in its name doesn't make it any part of government. It is an instutition of some kind: an NGO.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson