I am amazed that Republican leadership cannot get together and find one- JUST ONE credible conservative candidate. There are lots of good conservative men and women in leadership positions today. The media will annoit whomever they want as the frontrunner, but it has to be credible. There is NO way that the multiply divorced, pro-death Giuliani will receive credible support from Republicans. I like and respect him in a lot of ways, but not on the one main issue of abortion, esp. partial birth. And I am so deeply connected to the issue of babies and life that a Guiliani or a Hillary presidency will both, in my mind, lead to a "very far left country."
I do understand what you are saying, however electing the next president, to me, will very well shape the Supreme Court for many many years to come. Rudy - Hillary - they are the same.
I will promise you this however-- IF those 2 are the nominees, I will strongly re-consider my vote. You may want to bookmark this thread to remind me. (-:
I don't think the many Republicans who stayed home in November really considered how much of an effect THAT act had on the future SC. Everything hinges on 2008.
"I like and respect him in a lot of ways, but not on the one main issue of abortion, esp. partial birth. And I am so deeply connected to the issue of babies and life that a Guiliani or a Hillary presidency will both, in my mind, lead to a "very far left country."
That's funny, I thought the "one main issue" in this election was the WAR ON ISLAMIC FASCISM.
I am pro life, but if that is the opinion of most conservatives, we are in big trouble.
"I do understand what you are saying, however electing the next president, to me, will very well shape the Supreme Court for many many years to come. Rudy - Hillary - they are the same."
That is not true. As you will soon learn, Rudy would appoint strict constructionists to the SCOTUS.