Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ON EDUCATION: Intelligence in the Classroom
opinionjournal.com ^ | Tuesday, January 16, 2007 | CHARLES MURRAY

Posted on 01/16/2007 6:19:46 AM PST by Pharmboy

Half of all children are below average, and teachers can do only so much for them.

Education is becoming the preferred method for diagnosing and attacking a wide range problems in American life. The No Child Left Behind Act is one prominent example. Another is the recent volley of articles that blame rising income inequality on the increasing economic premium for advanced education. Crime, drugs, extramarital births, unemployment--you name the problem, and I will show you a stack of claims that education is to blame, or at least implicated. One word is missing from these discussions: intelligence. Hardly anyone will admit it, but education's role in causing or solving any problem cannot be evaluated without considering the underlying intellectual ability of the people being educated. Today and over the next two days, I will put the case for three simple truths about the mediating role of intelligence that should bear on the way we think about education and the nation's future.

Today's simple truth: Half of all children are below average in intelligence. We do not live in Lake Wobegon.

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News
KEYWORDS: bellcurve; charlesmurray; education; iq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last
To: SandwicheGuy

I think it describes the median, which I believe is the most common understanding of "average" when it comes to demographics. I'm no statistician, but my understanding is that, if you take for instance the following set: 2,6,7,11,19

1. "Median" would be 7, with 2 and 6 below median and 11 and 14 above median

2. "Mean" would be 9, which is the sum divided by 5.

All that being said, I think I understand better the objection to what Murray said, now that its been explained. The IQ test is not accurate enough to know exactly who is average as opposed to a little above or a little below.

Still, I don't think Murray's point was that the measuring tool is necessarily precise, but that hypothetically, regardless of whether we can ACTUALLY DETERMINE who is above or below median, some are below average and some are above IN REALITY.


81 posted on 01/18/2007 2:10:33 PM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: GSlob; Pharmboy

Here are the other two articles in Murray's WSJ series.

What's Wrong with Vocational School http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110009535

Aztecs vs. Greeks http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110009541


82 posted on 01/18/2007 10:14:17 PM PST by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik

Thanks. I've seen both threads.


83 posted on 01/19/2007 5:12:04 AM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Link to

the second

and

the third and final installment

of this series by Murray.


84 posted on 01/23/2007 6:04:47 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson