[Miss Marple]

Well, we will see how he does. As I have said before, I will support whoever turns out to be the nominee for the Republicans...democrats are too dangerous to be in the Oval Office.

[Dog Gone]

Tancredo will get the support of the one-issue voter, the type that is overrepresented here at FR.

I doubt his candidacy will do any better than that of Alan Keyes, who is a tremendous debater, but was unable to reach out beyond his loyal and fervent base.

[Mo1]

democrats are too dangerous to be in the Oval Office.

I agree

[deport]

democrats are too dangerous to be in the Oval Office.

---

This will be an interesting primary season on both sides of the political spectrum.... Neither Party has an heir apparent and both will field a large contingent of wannabes in the beginning. You'll see the radicals from both fringes making a lot of noise and some will stay around till the last moment....

It's interesting that the Buchanan's are in the mix again. I'll have to give it to Bay in that she has a huge direct mail list in which to churn dollars with.

Newt had it correct imo that they public will not select a candidate on either end of the political spectrum but rather they want someone that appeals to the broad range. Given the message of the Buchanan's in the past, Tancredo's ability to create dissension, Paul's anti anything votes and Keyes, Corsi, Gilchrist, Baldwin mention of possible being the CP nominee it will definitely be a fun 18 months here on FR and in the political arena...

In the long run most of them will be inconsequential and the GOP nominee will come from someone more moderate and more appealing across the spectrum of ideas...