Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just sayin
My postings are genuine and I have real feelings that there is WAY more to the Smart story than we know and I have stated why I feel that way.

Feelings are not facts, nor do you offer any facts to support your feelings other than more feelings and perceptions, which again are not facts.

You are not the first feeling oriented person to voice your opinion on this subject on the internet. This is a really well debated issue on many forums, especially the true crime ones.

Since you are apparrently unable to use the internet to do research I will give you a thumbnail sketch as to why your feelings and perceptions are poorly received by those of us who rely more on logic and facts.

Weight gain can be explained by natural growth and your perception of actual weight gain is just that, a perception. There are many others who look at the same pictures and perceive negligible change in weight for a girl her age.

Also, the main photo distributed to the media was from when she was 13, a year before she was kidnapped and she was 15 when recovered. A two year difference that more than easily accounts for your perception.

KSL news photo cache 1

KSL news photo cache 2

Not of this change my feeling and perception that you are an ignorant and biased gossip either too lazy or to stupid to educate yourself that prefers to deal in speculation and emotion rather than facts or logic.

This picture of Elizabeth Smart (at age 13) was seen across America on billboards, buttons, missing posters, and in the media upon her disappearance on June 5, 2002.

ES (age 15) with her family shortly after her return, she is now as toll as her mother.

253 posted on 01/17/2007 12:49:46 PM PST by Valpal1 (Social vs fiscal conservtism? Sorry, I'm not voting my wallet over the broken bodies of the innocent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]


To: Valpal1

Who said feelings were facts? YOU DID! If you see no differences in those pictures so be it.

I don't give a flying rats behind how you percieve my perceptions. See that yet?

I like how you say "can be" and state it as fact. Nice. Why is "can be" acceptable to you but it cannot be to me? Explain that on second thought don't, I think it is self explanitory.

Ill bite on the could can maybe might that you pose, notice that is no the fact you pose it to be. It is perception. When on the run weight is gained? That doesn't fit, at all.

Nor does this trial not going forward. Might I be wrong in my perception. Of course. I have said that clearly already in this thread.

At least I will admit, from the very begining, that I have a perception while you state you have all the facts.

The reality is that we don't, not you or I, and what you have is a perception, just like me.

More slamming from you, it seems that is your true goal. That is the goal of a troll.

You have a perception based on what you see and so do I......accept that and move on.




254 posted on 01/17/2007 1:09:31 PM PST by Just sayin (Is is what it is, for if it was anything else, it would be isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson