Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hunter112
You present a strong defense of your position; however, my sense of what you wrote is that you, are convinced, that the males hung around the cave, spending idle time having sex....my position is that, sex was not a casual continuous activity, but, rather was a sporadic exercise, driven by the seasons, the amount of sunlight, and availability of food....further, I am convinced, that the female, had cycles of rut, which would control her interest in sex...this may have extended to the males...in fact, I believe cycles of rut prevail today....
419 posted on 01/16/2007 5:25:27 AM PST by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: thinking
You present a strong defense of your position; however, my sense of what you wrote is that you, are convinced, that the males hung around the cave, spending idle time having sex....my position is that, sex was not a casual continuous activity, but, rather was a sporadic exercise, driven by the seasons, the amount of sunlight, and availability of food....further, I am convinced, that the female, had cycles of rut, which would control her interest in sex...this may have extended to the males...in fact, I believe cycles of rut prevail today....

Thank you for your complimentary remarks, many folks here think far less of my arguments!

I acknowledge that sex needs certain conditions to be considered desireable or possible, surely, being threatened by a sabre-toothed tiger is not going to have the Viagra effect on a cave man. I base my belief in the high probability of constant casual sexual activity among prehistoric human populations on the fact that most of that portion of humanity has lived within the tropical zones, which had optimum living conditions for humans at the time, in regards to climate, food supply, etc. Populations living at the edges of the ice sheets were indeed less likely to have engaged in casual sex, since the need to hunt and gather consumed major portions of waking time.

I also question the "need" for a male to have had a female's consent to engage in a sex act, it would have been far more important to have either the acquiescence or ignorance of the alpha male of the tribe, unless of course, one was the alpha male.

What do you base your contention that females have natural cycles of "rut" on? There certainly are times in the menstual cycle that are more conducive to approaching a female, but since human beings are not strictly locked into a "heat" or mating season as are non-primate mammals, I'm interested in seeing your evidence that there is a "rut" cycle in our species.

487 posted on 01/16/2007 9:55:04 AM PST by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson