Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hunter112; Fairview
"No, people really didn't refrain from it all that much, they were just way more hypocritical about it."

Not quite: in the past, thoughtless, heartless, careless, illicit sexual behavior was seen as being bad: people who behaved badly, sexually, either didn't repent, and developed seared consciences and hard hearts; or they repented, and grew to be people of good conscience and good heart. Society in general --- at some periods of our cultural history --- encouraged the good.

The difference now is that society in general relentlessly reaches for your wallet via your crotch. That makes it much harder to be good, or even to know, deeply, what "goodness" is.

374 posted on 01/15/2007 4:46:20 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Good sex: the basis of a good civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

Thank you; excellent point.


381 posted on 01/15/2007 5:47:33 PM PST by Fairview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o
The difference now is that society in general relentlessly reaches for your wallet via your crotch. That makes it much harder to be good, or even to know, deeply, what "goodness" is.

Which sums it up rather completely.

433 posted on 01/16/2007 6:26:01 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson