Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachoman

Am I wrong in thinking this is the "Al Gore tax"? I know he was able to put some sort of tax on telephone service, supposedly to help rural communities be able to put in telephone lines.


9 posted on 01/14/2007 8:17:08 PM PST by basil (Exercise your Second Amendment rights--buy another gun today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: basil

I haven't kept up with telecom regulation, but I wouldn't be surprised if this was a corruption of the Universal Service fee which I belive Al Gore championed.


10 posted on 01/14/2007 8:20:14 PM PST by Nachoman (Just because you're a kook doesn't mean there isn't a conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: basil
The E tax is different.

This is the Universal Service charge. So American citizens living in such fun places as Titilik, or St Marys Village can have phone service for *far less* than they would have to pay otherwise.

Phone rates are low in bush Alaska - thanks to the subsidy.

Urban supports rural, really rural get a good but not free ride.

This is a leftover from when AT&T ran a FedGoc supported monopoly service. Oh, wait......
11 posted on 01/14/2007 8:26:37 PM PST by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson