Nineteen states charge customers a fee to defray the costs to phone companies of providing service in high-cost areas. Of these, 12 do not exempt cell phones Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Kansas, Maine, Nebraska, Nevada, Texas, Utah and Wyoming.
1 posted on
01/14/2007 6:37:13 PM PST by
Dubya
To: Dubya
Since 2003, these states have together collected more than $4 billion, an Associated Press investigation found. The burden is shared by cellular and regular phone customers alike. In some states, cell users appear to be footing more than half the bill.
2 posted on
01/14/2007 6:47:48 PM PST by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
To: Dubya
C'mon. They have to generate money from somewhere to feed the CEO's bonuses.
3 posted on
01/14/2007 6:54:51 PM PST by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
To: Dubya
Most consumers overlook the small surcharges on their telephone bills. It's hard to overlook them when, for instance, you accidentally receive an instant message not meant for you. I pay per use because I don't use IM. SO..that instant message is, say, five cents. But then the fees and taxes kick in, and before you know it, it's another 4 to 5 bucks added to my bill.
6 posted on
01/14/2007 7:17:05 PM PST by
Mygirlsmom
(sdrawkca-ssaB eb ot smees gnihtyreve tuoba tsuj ,syad esehT)
To: Dubya
ALL incumbent telco's (ILEC's) are inherently evil, sleazy companies. The CLEC's are not a whole lot better - they just wish they could be like the ILECs.
7 posted on
01/14/2007 7:19:51 PM PST by
ikka
To: Dubya
"It's egregious . . . By nature, these fees are highly discriminatory because cell users pay in far more than they get out of it." I say the same thing about my income taxes every year.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson