[Apogee]

Don't forget to add the History Channel's special on the Anti-Christ this weekend. Though I can agree with some of their facts (much of the American emphasis on the above mentioned, the rapture, and the apocalypse all really does stem from 19th century ideas more than first century ones), the language was overall very biased.

[weegee]

Mohammed was an antiChrist (one against Christ), he used the word of Jesus (rewritten), denied His divinity, His death, and His resurrection. Mohammed led the flock astray; a false prophet.

And his followers dream of an Islamic empire, where the kufir are enslaved for labor and sexual purposes. No more thought given to their (our) slaughter than the killing of a cow or a fish. Radical Imam spout these very words yet there is no global outcry.

Does it have a Biblical/Apocalyptic meaning? I don't know. I do know that Mohammed is an antiChrist figure. No other major religion acknowledges the existence of Jesus while at the same time denying Him.

[Alouette]

FRmail me to be added or removed from this Judaic/pro-Israel/Russian Jewry ping list.

Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.

[Marysecretary]

It always is. Whenever anything Biblical is on, they have their liberal professors, etc., on to refute it. Bah, humbug.