Replies

Thank you for your reply.

I am aware of the Ukrainian protests, being Ukrainian myself.

If you read the review (webpage in my post), you will notice that the spin-masters at the pulitzers dodged the famine question by stating that a PP is only for a specific set of articles.

I feel that showing that Duranty lied in his prize articles will ipso facto invalidate his prize. I will then accuse the Times of lies in their revised statement.

The challenge will then be to have the times admit the lies they allowed Duranty to print, similar to the Jayson Blair mea culpas the Times printed, something they have never done in that detail for Duranty.

Proving that Duranty was liar throughout his career can become quite a cottage industry. This is not to disparage the famine, but Duranty and a gaggle of other liars did much damage by writing positively about the Soviet regime.

Duranty offers many avenues of throwing barbs at the times, which has shown itself dishonest. The Sulzbergers, amateur propagandists with an agenda should suffer long and severely for their criminal activity (Stalin was a criminal; Duranty was a criminal for 'glossing over' his crimes; Adolf Ochs was an accomplice allowing Duranty to publish his toxic waste in the Times; and the rest of this satanic family has much to answer for.).