Posted on 01/14/2007 9:17:17 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
We've all heard the complaint that politicians can be fair weather and change their minds depending on which way the political wind is blowing.
But this week, weather and politics came together in a most peculiar way in Sacramento.
First, the governor, by executive order, decreed that the state will have new standards for low-carbon motor vehicle fuel to help combat global warming.
Then he announced as part of his State of the State that he wants to build two new dams because Sierra snowpack runoff is happening earlier in the year. Why? Global warming.
This, of course, all happened on the same week that the governor ended up declaring a state of emergency -- because of extremely cold weather.
Guess we can't blame global warming on that one.
(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...
And what in the world is "low-carbon motor vehicle fuel"? The only one that comes to mind is hydrogen which has zero carbon and that's decades away. Does this announcement mean they plan to somehow further hydrogenate gasoline?
As I understand it, natural gas has less carbon than gasoline.
The problem with the lighter hydrocarbons is that they are gaseous at room temperature. The heavier ones we use for fuel, the reference fuel being iso-octane (8 carbons) and all of the lighter ones (and I'm not talking oxygenated fuels like methanol or ethanol) are saturated hydrocarbons. That means that there are no carbon-carbon double bonds, all C-C bonds are single and every empty bond space is taken up by a hydrogen atom. You cannot "hydrogenate" a saturated hydrocarbon. End of story. If you "hydrogenate" an alcohol like ethanol or methanol you get ethane or methane respectively. We're back to square one. What we should REALLY be doing is developing Sabatier reactors to produce natural gas or methanol OR ethanol. This has a desired side-effect (and my true agenda shows through here) that we will then have the knowledge and the technology to produce one of these hydrocarbons on MARS to facilitate manned exploration.
Pardon my ignorance. Aren't hydrocarbon fuels for rockets or landers rather a poor choice? Elsewhere than Earth don't you have to produce and contain/control the oxydizer as well as the fuel?
Wouldn't some form of propulsion other than "burning" be more efficient under such circumstances?
http://autos.msn.com/advice/article.aspx?contentid=4023502&src=LP%20pickups
I have read that chevy will market it this year in CA.
We're setting record lows in Bakersfield.
I guess "it depends on what your meaning of the word [warming] is."
Global warming is determined by the number of places setting record highs, not those setting record lows. That's because we all know that global warming is occurring so those places with record lows can be ignored. They're just nondescript artifacts of no meaning.
It's mostly a matter of perspective, and the media are heavily loaded with an East Coast-centric point of view. In the West our snow-pack is just shy of 160%, it's just popped above zero Fahrenheit where I'm typing and it's snowing. In the East they're having a warm weather, ergo the entire world is melting. Go figure.
Balance just wouldn't suit the agenda, would it.
Even on Earth you have to produce/contain/control the oxidizer because you use liquid oxygen.
Hydrocarbons work VERY well (especially light ones) for first stage rockets. You can achieve high performance (not as high as hydrogen) with a smaller system. Hydrogen propellant tanks get very large due to the low density of liquid hydrogen.
It was 27 degrees from 4:45 until about 8:15 this morning in my low desert yard. Last winter no overnight low was below 40. (I watch this carefully, because our system is a Heat Pump, and they can get goosey if the temp drops into the thirties).
The good news never ends...we anticipate another El Nino this summer...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.