I've a feeling their military bases are made of more substantial stuff. We'd be hitting those, not cities full of civilians.
Bush wouldn't get the support in the spineless senate is one reason,
Fortunately he doesn't need it. He gives the orders and the military drops the bobms. Let the Senate howl.
The French and Germans would be upset because of all the arms for cheap oil deals they would loose
F 'em.
and Russia and it's nuclear sales,
Good.
They'd much rather see Israel vaporized than take action against Iran.
Then it's a good thing they aren't our President.
L
And they build them far away from civilians, because we all know how caring Muzzies are about women and children...
" Fortunately he doesn't need it. He gives the orders and the military drops the bobms. Let the Senate howl."
Not that simple. The nation would have to be in imminent danger.(didn't stop Clinton from bombing Serbs though) Plus we all know what would happen next. The left would be demanding Bush be impeached for "war Crimes" and acting without the approval of the UN and international community. Same old song and dance, but it will be louder.
The French and Germans would be upset because of all the arms for cheap oil deals they would loose
F 'em.
and Russia and it's nuclear sales,
Good.
Again, that's not how the real world works. It's easy to talk tough and say we should simply toss bombs on things that bother us, but that only works in video games. This isn't a video game.