Replies

Knowing the Rats are worse than the Repubs on this subject, conservatives shot themselves in the foot by penalizing good candidates over the failures of th eBush Administration.

Now we will see Bush succeed in signing a bill on manesty which is crafted by the Kennedys et al, with no impact being made by the Republicans in COngress to stop it.

Bush is not the Republican Party and the Republican Party is not necessarily conservatism. But you have to compare the candidates with the Rats who run against them. If the candidate is essentially a philosphical Rat, don't vote for him even if he claims he's a Republican. But if there are only a few issues on which the candidate is liberal, but otherwise he or she is conservative, they are still better than a Rat.

Sorry I was away Your post is ridiculous! Amnesty was proposed in S2261 by Sen Martinez, now the titular head of the RNC. If you go to www.caseykey.com, you will see that Conservatives were PREDICTING the Amnesty would be signed AFTER the elections and there was no hedge about the Dims being in control. BOTH PARTIES are in agreement and AGAINST the people, 80 % of whom want an end to illegal immigration. WHEN, not if Amnesty is signed, kiss a bunch of Conservatives GOODBYE! along with 2008. I voted for a DIM for the first time in 30 years, for Attorney General in the State to put any CROOKS in jail and to balance the GOP votes I cast. Indeed, I left all of the other State and County positions BLANK in hopes ROVE would get the message.

Big Business wants cheap labor and the Dims want cheap votes - what a duo. Bush is the best moderate Dim we could have voted in.