Even if the Special Prosecutor were fully aware of all the discussions on Durham-In-Wonderland, etc. it would be grossly improper to drop the case on the basis of anything other than either original documents/transcripts or certified copies thereof.
Right but here is what I think it takes to drop the case:
1. Day one: Read Mangums various statements. [That should be sufficient, but they will want to do more leg work.]
2. Day two: Read the DNA results and the physical evidence gathered in the search, the SANE report, the transcript of the line up, the various cell phone data and pictures and the transcipt of the witnesses including Bissey, Robert [aka Pittman] and the various uncharged lacrosse players.
3. Day three: Read the defense evidence including Seligmann's alibi and the defense motions offered in the case. Meet with the defendants or their attorneys. Listen to the Finnerty alibi if offerred.
4. Day four: Meet with Mangum. Make go through her story again and ask her about inconsistencies.
5. Day five: Call a press conference announce that there is no evidence beyond Mangum's claim that has changed greatly. Explain that the pictures and Seligmann's alibi makes all her IDs suspect. Announce this makes the AG's office unwilling to contest the defense ID motion. Announce that the DNA from other people and the lack of DNA from any Duke lacrosse player or other party goer combined with Pittman [aka Roberts] seeing nothing makes it very unlikely a crime other than underage drinking was committed at the Duke lacrosse team party. Announce that in the interest of justice the charges have been dropped.