ugly women make us drink beer!!!
Posted on 01/13/2007 8:39:47 AM PST by Dark Skies
It was clear throughout his presidency, to me at least, that she often wished she could push him off the stage and take the microphone. The more adoring she acted, the more suspicious it looked.
ROFLOL Nailed her!
"I am beginning to think that the 2006 victory of the Dims is the best thing that could happen for the Republicans in '08."
Could be. That Boxer comment was so idiotic. Singles without children certainly do understand the sacrifices made by those who have children in the military. This single does and I'm sure Condi does also. There goes bi-partisan good will.
Seems like all the Democrates can do is put their feet in their mouths and make these outrageous statements and make themselves look like brainless idiots! This will be an interesting two yeas.
I didn't list them all.
http://www.childfreebychoice.com/history.htm
I am beginning to think that the 2006 victory of the Dims is the best thing that could happen for the Republicans in '08.
You are absolutly right! Hopefully the voters will wake up and smell the coffee.
So you wouldn't have voted for Margaret Thatcher?
Thank you!!!
Bump!
More like SKANK pack.
And the women seem to be leading the pack.
Half of those embryos ARE female humans, too.
If they all appear on the same show...it might turn into a cat fight for face time and babble time. That would be fun to watch...
Thank you. Add in Ann Coulter, Condi Rice, and countless less famous but equally rational women.
You could say the same thing as the OP about men if you only use as your sample Ted Kennedy, John Kerry and Bill Clinton.
Any bets on how long it will be before there are major cat fights.
(Female) Democrats seem to relate everything to their nurturing role as mothers. Pelosi had children join her at the podium, Boxer criticizes Rice's capacities based on a lack of motherhood experience, Edwards talks about sending "boys and girls" to die. A whole contingent accompanies Cindy Sheehan using her grief as a mother as a legitimate platform on which to base public policy decisions regarding the war. Democrats seem to feel that this is a perfectly legitimate, if not preferable, basis on which to make foreign policy decisions.
They say that there is a difference in the way women will typically fight in comparison to men. Women will wait until the confrontation crosses their threshold. Men will take the battle away from their home. Maggie Thatcher was supposed to have been a great strategist in that she took the battle away from home.
In my opinion, Republicans need to identify, isolate and discredit emotional rhetoric and insist that public policy be made on robust, clean fact with assumptions closely examined and logic and consistency used to make decisions. The media and the Pubs. seem to buy into the emitional rationale as a credible basis for decision. We need to name it and expose it for what it is.
Sorry....had to.
Seriously, get Firefox and the Adblock plugin and your're golden.
I use Firefox exclusively. I can't remember the last time I saw a pop-up.
Any "man" who supports democrats and being governed by these shrews needs to grow a pair. These kind of women are your worst nightmare when looking for a relationship, why would you want those types of nut-jobs making your laws.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.