Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye
"because the '18" benchmark' was and is irrelevant to the debate I was having with another FReeper"

You wish. Now you're squirming to avoid the issue.

In your "debate with another FReeper" you said, "The use of short barreled shotguns by the military has a long and distinguished history." I simply responded that those "short-barrelled shotguns" used by the military were greater than 18" -- actually they were 20". Very relevant to your debate.

The NFA taxed "sawed-off" shotguns less than 18" because they were used by criminals, concealed under their clothing.

Two different types of weapons that you're putting in one category, and you're uncomfortable that I pointed that out. Too bad.

265 posted on 01/17/2007 5:44:25 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
because they were used by criminals

Funny, police and military are exempted from such prohibition. I wonder why?

267 posted on 01/17/2007 7:06:28 AM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen

You must be a complete idiot. I showed that the Marine Corps ordered over 20,000 shotguns with 14" barrels. But the argument never was about 1934 NFA regulations. So your contribution, as always, is completely and irrefutably irrelevant.


276 posted on 01/17/2007 11:42:03 PM PST by TigersEye (If you don't understand the 2nd Amendment you don't understand America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson