Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spunkets
"One was that "the people" refered to in the Constitution are citizens of the US."

Ah. So foreign visitors have no rights. The police can break down their hotel room door and search their room without a warrant since the fourth amendment "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects ...." only refers to citizens of the US.

Correct? This is what you're asking me to believe Taney was talking about?

You need to do some more reading.

185 posted on 01/14/2007 5:35:06 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
"Ah. So foreign visitors have no rights. The police can break down their hotel room door and search their room without a warrant since the fourth amendment "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects ...." only refers to citizens of the US."

Irrelevant. They are not US citizens, which means they are not "the people". Besides that, the President, Congress and the fed courts don't agree that they have 4th Amend rights. See the Patriot Act, which mostly refers to non-US citizens, which are not "the people" and rulings on that Act. They also don't agree that the Constitution applies to them, since their political speech is severely restricted in law and they can not vote. Practice in D areas and activities by D sympathizers, notwithstanding.

"Correct? This is what you're asking me to believe Taney was talking about?"

I pointed out clearly what Taney said and what he was referring to. I didn't ask you to believe anything. Taney said what he did in rather plain English. I just made the presentation and laid it out.

186 posted on 01/14/2007 5:55:46 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson