Skip to comments.
Democrats unveil energy package (one more piece of the "100 'Barfs per hour' agenda")
AP on Yahoo ^
| 1/12/07
| H. Josef Hebert - ap
Posted on 01/12/2007 11:41:22 AM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Barfs per hour = BPH
How many can you stand before having to push away from the keyboard? ;-)
2
posted on
01/12/2007 11:42:21 AM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... California 2007,, Where's a script re-write guy when ya need 'em?)
To: NormsRevenge
3
posted on
01/12/2007 11:43:15 AM PST
by
Renegade
To: NormsRevenge
House Democrats next week will push to impose a conservation fee on oil and natural gastax
4
posted on
01/12/2007 11:43:22 AM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
To: NormsRevenge
When will the American people wake up?
5
posted on
01/12/2007 11:43:33 AM PST
by
unkus
To: NormsRevenge
So the congress basically wants to break the contract it made with the oil and gas companies. Is is any wonder why no one trusts the government?
That was some deal that CLINTON signed!
6
posted on
01/12/2007 11:46:14 AM PST
by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: NormsRevenge
And who actually pays those increased fees, the oil company or the consumer? /rhetorical
7
posted on
01/12/2007 11:47:39 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(Pelosi, the call was for Comity, not Comedy. But thanks for the laughs. StarKisses, NVA.)
To: NormsRevenge
... oil and gas companies would be barred from future Gulf lease sales unless they agree to renegotiate flawed 1998-99 leases that allowed them to avoid federal royalty payments. ...both parties have expressed anger at the refusal of oil and gas companies to rework the 1998-99 leases that were issued without a provision that required royalty payments if oil and gas prices soared as they have in recent years. And just how will ROYALTY PAYMENTS to the government bring down the gas prices?
They won't!
It's just the government wants in on some of that action!........
8
posted on
01/12/2007 11:47:47 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(New! HeadOn Hemorrhoid Medication for Liberals!.........Apply directly to forehead.........)
To: NormsRevenge
So the Pelosi lead Congress wants to make it harder for the working poor to get to/from work and more expensive to heat their homes.
9
posted on
01/12/2007 11:48:11 AM PST
by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: NonValueAdded
The Dems don't care. As long as they get the $ for their Social Engineering.
10
posted on
01/12/2007 11:48:52 AM PST
by
unkus
To: frogjerk
Contracts are for little people and Republicans, apparently. This sounds like extortion.
11
posted on
01/12/2007 11:49:18 AM PST
by
Truth29
To: NormsRevenge
Taxing energy sources is probably a way to induce the US public to "conserve", but while the effect is to reduce energy use, energy will still have an irreducible minimum demand. If absolutely necessary, people will simply ignore the taxation imposed on the energy sources, and use bootleg sources. Like burning tires to run a boiler to drive an electric generation plant for home use, without regard for the pollution effects. Hard to keep hidden, if the energy Nazis are really interested in tracking it down, but one other thing we may depend upon, is that under these same people that insist on passing these laws calling for taxation of energy and conservation as a moral good, will also be unable to enforce those same laws, because of the widespread disregard of all laws they have encouraged for years.
12
posted on
01/12/2007 11:51:26 AM PST
by
alloysteel
(Character is a private trait. Reputation is the public aspect that is revealed.)
To: Red Badger
"It's just the government wants in on some of that action!........"
No doubt. Funny how they were silent in the 70's & 80's when many oil companies were starving and going out of business.
13
posted on
01/12/2007 11:55:05 AM PST
by
poobear
To: NormsRevenge
The bill also calls for a $9 a barrel "resource conservation" fee on oil, and a $1.25 per million Btu fee on natural gas, for production in the Gulf as long as market prices remain at more than $34.73 a barrel for oil and $4.34 per million Btu for gas. Holy moley! How are people supposed to heat their homes?
With foreign oil and gas I suppose.
14
posted on
01/12/2007 11:57:02 AM PST
by
NeoCaveman
(Conservatism hasn't been tried and found wanting, it has been found wanting to be tried.)
To: NormsRevenge
So they will repeal tax breaks and impose new taxes? That'll do wonders for the supply and price of energy. /s
15
posted on
01/12/2007 11:57:15 AM PST
by
mak5
To: NormsRevenge
These idiots are going to kill us.
16
posted on
01/12/2007 11:59:02 AM PST
by
VeniVidiVici
(Celebrate Mediocrity!)
To: NormsRevenge
Lawmakers of both parties have expressed anger at the refusal of oil and gas companies to rework the 1998-99 leases that were issued without a provision that required royalty payments if oil and gas prices soared as they have in recent years. Negotiated by some friend of Bill no doubt. (might have been some dirty campaign contributions for Gore involved I think)
17
posted on
01/12/2007 12:00:27 PM PST
by
Pontiac
(All are worthy of freedom, none are incapable.)
To: NormsRevenge
Great plan! Drive up the cost of domestic production of oil to make us more dependent on foreign sources! Good job Dems.! OPEC and Al Qaeda thank you! Meanwhile, be sure to blame Bush and robber barron energy execs. for the resulting record energy prices from your assinine ideas.
18
posted on
01/12/2007 12:27:15 PM PST
by
MikeA
(Nancy Pelosi: The Speaker of the News Media)
To: NormsRevenge
and of course the 1998-99 lease negotiations were all Bush's fault. Just ask Sandy Bergler!!
To: Red Badger
And just how will ROYALTY PAYMENTS to the government bring down the gas prices? The oil is owned by taxpayers -- the oil companies are pumping taxpayer oil without paying for it, because Clinton screwed up the paperwork.
20
posted on
01/12/2007 12:33:26 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heie)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson