Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SomeoneNeedsToSayIt
"Saying it to me in private is far more important than whatever she says nationally," he huffed, referring to her weekend TV appearance.

So he's essentially calling her a liar???? Cool!

25 posted on 01/12/2007 12:59:37 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Actually, I think what he was saying was that she was being slightly discourteous when she announced a tax increase without consulting the head of the committee in charge of tax increases.

Similar to Speaker Pelosi’s complaint about Bush and being informed instead of consulted about the war in Iraq.

You’d think she’d be more sensitive to that!
26 posted on 01/12/2007 1:17:50 PM PST by SomeoneNeedsToSayIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

What he is saying is that Nancy doesn't get to set the agenda for his committee. She can't go on tv and say something is going to happen if she hasn't cleared it with him first.

Way it is. Way it's going to be.

Nancy looks real dumb here. It's not like she didn't know Rangel wasn't going to lay down and roll over for her.


33 posted on 01/12/2007 3:33:36 PM PST by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson