Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cinives
a time when one party was essentially treated as slaves w/o rights under the law

A standard feminist lie.

74 posted on 01/12/2007 5:02:37 AM PST by Jim Noble (To secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble; cinives

Women were not slaves under common law, but I still do not think we need to go back there. Common law was designed for landed gentry-types. Women had rights under common law. They were not slaves. Those rights might seem weird today and disproportionate though.

Either way, you guys can hopefully agree that this situation is wrong.


82 posted on 01/12/2007 5:16:15 AM PST by okiecon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble
You need to read your history. You are saying with a straight face that women were not treated as property in the history of this country ?

http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/awhhtml/awlaw3/property_law.html

90 posted on 01/12/2007 5:25:09 AM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson