To: cinives
a time when one party was essentially treated as slaves w/o rights under the lawA standard feminist lie.
74 posted on
01/12/2007 5:02:37 AM PST by
Jim Noble
(To secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity)
To: Jim Noble; cinives
Women were not slaves under common law, but I still do not think we need to go back there. Common law was designed for landed gentry-types. Women had rights under common law. They were not slaves. Those rights might seem weird today and disproportionate though.
Either way, you guys can hopefully agree that this situation is wrong.
82 posted on
01/12/2007 5:16:15 AM PST by
okiecon
To: Jim Noble
You need to read your history. You are saying with a straight face that women were not treated as property in the history of this country ?
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/awhhtml/awlaw3/property_law.html
90 posted on
01/12/2007 5:25:09 AM PST by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson