"In effect this decision supports a woman's right to lie about the paternity of her children."
Men were innocent until proven guilty.
If this is allowed to stand we are not just guilty bt mere accusation, but even if we are proven innocent: we are subject to the same punative action that the guilty are.
1) This should be appealed.
2) The state should be sued for not prosecuting this woman for fraud and perjury.
3) This woman ought to be sued into the poor house for her deliberate fraud.
You obviously haven't been following the Duke Lacrosse team fiasco. Nowadays it's verdict first - trial later.
The lawsuit against the woman is interesting. Proving deliberate fraud could be easy in some cases, but not in this one. She will claim she did not know if it was this guy or another guy and, therefore, it was not deliberate, etc. However, I think it could be won.
The problem is this woman does not have any money. She is on welfare, most likely, and the Ark. CSE was and/or is recouping welfare payments.